Behavioral and demographic predictors of staff ratings of role model status in a corrections-based therapeutic community for women
Author:
I. Hodge Ashleigh,L. Warren Keith,V. Linley Jessica
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine personal and social network characteristics that predict staff ratings of therapeutic community (TC) resident role model status.
Design/methodology/approach
– In all, 49 incarcerated female residents tracked interactions with peers, including verbal affirmations and corrections, during a 12-hour period. Two weeks later, staff members were surveyed about their view of participants as role models. Poisson regression was used to analyze resident interactions and demographics as predictors of role model status.
Findings
– The number of corrections given to peers was positively related to staff ratings of role model status (B=0.234, SE=0.088, p=0.008). The number of affirmations given was negatively related to staff ratings (B=−0.112, SE=0.051, p=0.028). Resident phase was positively related to staff ratings (B=0.256, SE=0.102, p=0.012). These values did not significantly change when controlling for affirmations and corrections received from peers, non-programmatic interactions between residents, or resident demographics.
Research limitations/implications
– These results imply that TC staff judge role model status by resident actions in the community rather than demographics or peer reactions. External validity is limited by the single site, case study design, and the fact that only female TC residents were sampled.
Originality/value
– This study is the first to track resident peer interactions over the course of a day and to link those interactions to role model status.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Phychiatric Mental Health
Reference21 articles.
1. Adler, J.M.
,
Skalina, L.M.
and
McAdams, D.P.
(2008), “The narrative reconstruction of psychotherapy and psychological health”, Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 719-34. 2. Babyak, M.A.
(2004), “What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models”, Psychometric Medicine, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 411-21. 3. Borgatti, S.
,
Everett, M.
and
Freeman, L.
(2003), UCINET 6.0 Analytic Software, Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY. 4. Broekaert, E.
,
Vandevelde, S.
,
Schuyten, G.
,
Erauw, K.
and
Bracke, R.
(2004), “Evolution of encounter group methods in therapeutic communities for substance abusers”, Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 231-44. 5. Chan, K.S.
,
Wenzel, S.
,
Orlando, M.
,
Montagnet, C.
,
Mandell, W.
,
Becker, K.
and
Ebener, P.
(2004), “How important are client characteristics to understanding treatment process in the therapeutic community?”, American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 871-91.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|