The feasibility of delivering group Family Nurse Partnership

Author:

Barnes Jacqueline,Stuart Jane

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of delivering the group family nurse partnership (gFNP) programme, which combines elements of the family nurse partnership (FNP) programme and Centering Pregnancy and is offered from early pregnancy to 12 months postpartum to mothers under 25. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method descriptive feasibility study. Quantitative data from anonymised forms completed by nurses from November 2009 to May 2011 (pilot 1) and January 2012 to August 2013 (pilot 2) reporting referrals, attendance and client characteristics. Qualitative data collected between March 2010 and April 2011 (pilot 1) and November 2012 and November 2013 (pilot 2) from semi-structured interviews or focus groups with clients and practitioners. Findings – There were challenges to reaching eligible clients. Uptake of gFNP was 57-74 per cent, attendance ranged from 39 to 55 per cent of sessions and attrition ranged from 30 to 50 per cent. Clients never employed attended fewest sessions overall compared to those working full time. The group format and the programme’s content were positively received by clients but many struggled to attend regularly. FNP practitioners were positive overall but involving community practitioners (pilot 2) placed more stress on them. Research limitations/implications – Further feasibility and then cost and effectiveness research is necessary to determine the optimal staffing model. Practical implications – The content and style of support of the home-based FNP programme, available only to first time mothers under 20, could be offered to women over 20 and to those who already have a child. Social implications – A range of interventions is needed to support potentially vulnerable families. Originality/value – This new complex intervention lacks evidence. This paper documents feasibility, the first step in a thorough evaluation process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Health(social science)

Reference46 articles.

1. 4Children (2015), Children’s Centre Census 2015 , 4Children, London, available at: www.4children.org.uk/Resources/Detail/Childrens-Centre-Census-2015 (accessed 30 October 2015).

2. Allen, G. (2011), Early Intervention: The Next Steps , Cabinet Office, HM Government, London.

3. Anning, A. and Ball, M. (2008), Improving Services for Young Children. From Sure Start to Children’s Centres , Sage, London.

4. Baldwin, K.A. (2006), “Comparison of selected outcomes of Centering Pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care”, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health , Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 266-72.

5. Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”, Psychological Review , Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 191-215.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3