Author:
Barnes Jacqueline,Stuart Jane
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of delivering the group family nurse partnership (gFNP) programme, which combines elements of the family nurse partnership (FNP) programme and Centering Pregnancy and is offered from early pregnancy to 12 months postpartum to mothers under 25.
Design/methodology/approach
– A mixed method descriptive feasibility study. Quantitative data from anonymised forms completed by nurses from November 2009 to May 2011 (pilot 1) and January 2012 to August 2013 (pilot 2) reporting referrals, attendance and client characteristics. Qualitative data collected between March 2010 and April 2011 (pilot 1) and November 2012 and November 2013 (pilot 2) from semi-structured interviews or focus groups with clients and practitioners.
Findings
– There were challenges to reaching eligible clients. Uptake of gFNP was 57-74 per cent, attendance ranged from 39 to 55 per cent of sessions and attrition ranged from 30 to 50 per cent. Clients never employed attended fewest sessions overall compared to those working full time. The group format and the programme’s content were positively received by clients but many struggled to attend regularly. FNP practitioners were positive overall but involving community practitioners (pilot 2) placed more stress on them.
Research limitations/implications
– Further feasibility and then cost and effectiveness research is necessary to determine the optimal staffing model.
Practical implications
– The content and style of support of the home-based FNP programme, available only to first time mothers under 20, could be offered to women over 20 and to those who already have a child.
Social implications
– A range of interventions is needed to support potentially vulnerable families.
Originality/value
– This new complex intervention lacks evidence. This paper documents feasibility, the first step in a thorough evaluation process.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Health(social science)
Reference46 articles.
1. 4Children
(2015),
Children’s Centre Census 2015
, 4Children, London, available at: www.4children.org.uk/Resources/Detail/Childrens-Centre-Census-2015 (accessed 30 October 2015).
2. Allen, G.
(2011),
Early Intervention: The Next Steps
, Cabinet Office, HM Government, London.
3. Anning, A.
and
Ball, M.
(2008),
Improving Services for Young Children. From Sure Start to Children’s Centres
, Sage, London.
4. Baldwin, K.A.
(2006), “Comparison of selected outcomes of Centering Pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care”,
Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health
, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 266-72.
5. Bandura, A.
(1977), “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”,
Psychological Review
, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 191-215.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献