Abstract
PurposeEco-innovations (EIs) are intended to benefit not only the environment but society and firms, but how the relationship is reconciled is unclear, particularly in emerging economies. The advancement of EI has resulted in both positive and negative relationships with sustainability, indicating that the association is more complex than a simple linear one.Design/methodology/approachThus, the authors hypothesize that EI has a curvilinear relationship with sustainable business performance (SPB) and that market turbulence (MT) exerts stimulus that reinforces EIs. Accordingly, using the Stata software, the authors apply a moderated regression to a sample size data of 511 manufacturing firms to test the hypothesized assumptions.FindingsAlthough the results attest to a positive relationship between EI and SBP, the results are synonymous with an inverted “U” shape that renders EIs unprofitable beyond a certain threshold (rebound effect). Additionally, the authors observe that the moderation stimulus of technology turbulence flattens the inverted U-shaped curve.Originality/valueBuilt on the foundations of natural-resource-based view (NRBV) and contingency theory, the authors identify the rebound effect point of EI and SBP and the reinforcing stimulus of MT.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference77 articles.
1. Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?;Resources Policy,2021
2. Exploring financial performance and green logistics management practices: examining the mediating influences of market, environmental and social performances;Journal of Cleaner Production,2020
3. Hybrid artificial neural network and structural equation modelling techniques: a survey;Complex and Intelligent Systems,2022
4. External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018
5. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage;Journal of Management,1991