User participation and stakeholder involvement in health care innovation – does it matter?

Author:

Bjørkquist Catharina,Ramsdal Helge,Ramsdal Kjetil

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how and to what extent users can become involved in the process of selecting and implementing telecare and telehealth technologies in local health care services. Design/methodology/approach – The discussion is based on data from a project in one local authority in Norway. About 100 persons have participated in focus group interviews where issues regarding new telecare and telehealth technologies for the elderly were discussed. The focus groups involved different groups of product users and stakeholder groups, i.e. “older senior users” (over 65 years), “younger senior users” (55-65 years), relatives, health care professionals and general practitioners (GPs). Findings – Different user groups have different stakes in the technology. It is difficult to involve “older senior users” in the selection process due to their lack of information about potential solutions, while “younger senior users” are more informed and positive towards the introduction of telecare and telehealth technologies. The results also indicate that professionals are ambiguous towards new technologies; on the one hand they expect services to be better, but on the other they are concerned about ethical and working life issues that have not been fully explored as yet. Originality/value – This paper provides an understanding of how different groups of product users and stakeholder groups relate to and can be involved in an expanded implementation process of telecare and telehealth technology which allow older people to remain in their homes for longer.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference36 articles.

1. Amaral, A. and Magalhães, A. (2002), “The emergent role of external stakeholders in european higher education governance”, in Amaral, A. , Jones, G.A. and Karseth, B. (Eds), Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance , Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.

2. Andriof, J. , Waddock, S. , Husted, B. and Rahman, S.S. (2002), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement; with a Foreword by R. Edward Freeman , Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 1-22.

3. Bjørkquist, C. (2011), Stakeholder Regimes in Higher Education: Old Ideas in New Bottles? , Waxmann, Münster.

4. Borum, F. (1999), “Perspektiver på forandringsprocesser i sundheds- og sygehusfeltet (Perspectives on change processes in the health and hospital sector)”, in Bentsen, E.Z. , Borum, F. , Erlingsdóttir, G. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds), Når Styringsambitioner Møder Praksis (When Governing Ambitions Meet Practice) , Handelshøjskolens Forlag/Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp. 13-30.

5. Christensen, C.M. , Bohmer, R. and Kenagy, J. (2000), “Will disruptive innovations cure health care?”, Harvard Business Review , Sept/Oct, pp. 102-112, available at: https://wiki.umms.med.umich.edu/download/attachments/118335374/disruptive-innovations-cure-health.pdf

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3