Abstract
Purpose
Facilitation of genuine occupational engagement rather than a more superficial level of participation that has minimal therapeutic benefit is a challenge within secure mental health settings. The purpose of this paper is to develop, pilot and evaluate therapeutic tools based on a framework of occupational engagement.
Design/methodology/approach
The study used action research with occupational therapists from two secure residential units. Focus group discussions gathered participants’ views of how the occupational engagement framework could be used to inform a therapeutic tool. Following the development and piloting of the subsequent tools, focus groups were again used to review their usefulness in practice. Discussions were audio recorded and thematically analysed.
Findings
Three tools were designed and piloted. Evaluation revealed a number of benefits and different ways in which the tools could be used in practice.
Research limitations/implications
This research has indicated that the occupational engagement framework has potential for increasing understanding of the relationship between the value and consequences of participating in occupations. The limited timescale of the research restricted the opportunity to fully explore the tools’ potential effectiveness as outcome measures.
Practical implications
The clinical tools developed within this research have provided some information to the clinical teams which has contributed to their understanding of how service users experience participating in occupations.
Originality/value
The occupational engagement framework and resulting tools have the potential to enhance understanding of occupational engagement within secure settings.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference22 articles.
1. Reconsidering violence: a response to Twinley and Addidle (2012) and Morris (2012);British Journal of Occupational Therapy,2012
2. A qualitative study of service user experiences of occupation in forensic mental health;Australian Occupational Therapy Journal,2010
3. Cronin-Davis, J., Lang, A. and Molineux, M. (2004), “Occupational science: the forensic challenge”, in Molineux, M. (Ed.), Occupation for Occupational Therapists, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 169-79.
4. Drennan, G. and Alred, D. (Eds) (2013), Secure Recovery: Approaches to Recovery in Forensic Mental Health Settings, Routledge, London.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献