Abstract
Purpose
The “services triangle” is a dynamic model in which three interlinked entities (customer, employee and firm) combine to create three dyads [employee-firm (EF), customer-firm (CF) and customer-employee (CE)] that work together to deliver services. This study aims to determine whether significant differences exist vis-à-vis the impact of EF, CF and CE dyads on the service experience.
Design/methodology/approach
Empirical evidence from data garnered from 398 surveys was used to test a conceptual model. To test the hypotheses, like-signed first-order dyads were constructed and combined to create second-order dyads, and analysis of variance and post-hoc tests (least significant differences) were used to investigate whether differences among the second-order dyads exist.
Findings
The analysis reveals the differential impact of the three services triangle dyads on the service experience. Specifically, customers’ perception of EF fit appears to have the greatest impact on customers’ evaluation of the service experience, followed by CF and CE fit.
Research limitations/implications
The main implication is that this paper extends conceptual research by providing empirical evidence that the EF dyad is the foundation of the services triangle. The limitations are based primarily on methodology, where the use of a survey to collect data rules out the potential generalizations of true cause and effect while also potentially being subject to common method bias.
Practical implications
Managers should realize that fit within some dyads is more instrumental in determining the service experience than fit within others. A number of managerial implications are proposed and discussed.
Originality/value
Prior research has neither empirically examined the services triangle nor whether significant differences exists among the impact of its dyads on the service experience. Insights from various literatures, the application of the balance theory and the construction of first- and second-order dyads enables an investigation of the various relational patterns contained in the services triangle.
Reference67 articles.
1. Accenture (2015), “Customer 2020: Are you ready future-ready or reliving the past?”, available at: www.accenture.com/t00010101T000000__w__/itt/_acnmedia/Accenture/Converoon-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Local/it-it/PDF_3/Accenture-Customer-2020-FutureReady-Reliving-Past.pdf (accessed 4 December 2015).
2. Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: expanding the role of relationship marketing;Journal of Applied Psychology,2005
3. Service system fundamentals: work system, value chain, and life cycle;IBM Systems Journal,2008
4. An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes;The Journal of Psychology,2008
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献