Author:
Block Jan,Ahmadi Alireza,Tyrberg Tommy,Söderholm Peter
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to present the prerequisites for a part-out-based spares provisioning (PBSP) programme during the phase-out of an aircraft fleet. Furthermore, associated key decision criteria are identified and a framework for the phase-out management process is presented.
Design/methodology/approach
– Once a decision has been taken to phase-out an aircraft fleet, a number of routines for operations, maintenance and storage are affected and new tasks and functions must be introduced before initiating the actual parting-out process. A decision-making system and a management framework is needed to manage spares planning during the end-of-life phase to ensure availability at minimum cost and to ensure a manageable risk of backorders.
Findings
– For PBSP programme during the phase-out of an aircraft fleet to succeed and be cost-effective, a number of linked processes, tasks and decisions are required, e.g., those included in the framework proposed in this paper (see Figure 3). A successful implementation of PBSP also requires that these processes and tasks are carried out in a timely manner and that the communications between the concerned parties are prompt, clear and direct. One experience from the studied case is that close and trustful contacts and cooperation between the operator and maintenance provider(s) will greatly facilitate the process.
Originality/value
– Although the PBSP method is fairly commonly applied within both the military and the civilian sector, somewhat surprisingly very literature has been published on the subject. Indeed, remarkably little has been published on any aspects of maintenance during the end-of-life period.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference25 articles.
1. Ahmadi, A.
(2010), “Aircraft scheduled maintenance programme development: decision support methodologies and tools”, doctoral thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, ISBN 978-91-7439-114-5.
2. Ahmadi, A.
and
Kumar, U.
(2011), “Cost based risk analysis to identify inspection and restoration intervals of hidden failures subject to aging”, IEEE Transaction on Reliability, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 197-209.
3. Ahmadi, A.
,
Block, J.
and
Kumar, U.
(2012), “Risk based maintenance deferral of components subject to hidden failure”, Proceeding of: the 58th IEEE Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Reno, NV, January 23-26.
4. Ameri, F.
and
Dutta, D.
(2005), “Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops”, Computer Aided Design & Applications, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 577-590.
5. Block, J.
(2009), “Dependability analysis of military aircraft fleet performance in a lifecycle perspective”, licentiate thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, ISBN 978-91-86233-96-9.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献