Abstract
PurposeIn crowdsourcing contests, the capabilities and performance of individual workers (solvers) determine whether seeker firms can obtain satisfactory solutions from the platform. It is noted that solvers may learn such skills in crowdsourcing from doing (experiential learning) or observing (vicarious learning). However, it remains unclear if such learning can be materialized into improved performance considering the unique settings of crowdsourcing contests. The study aims to understand how experiential learning and vicarious learning enhance solver performance and under what conditions.Design/methodology/approachThe model was tested using survey and archival data from 261 solvers on a large contest platform in China.FindingsResults support the premise that experiential learning and vicarious learning separately and jointly enhance solver performance. Moreover, perceived task uncertainty strengthens the effect of vicarious learning but weakens the effect of experiential learning, whereas perceived competition uncertainty weakens the effect of vicarious learning.Originality/valueThe current study enriches the understanding of the impacts of experiential learning and vicarious learning and offers a more nuanced understanding of the conditions under which solvers can reap the performance benefits from learning in crowdsourcing contests. The study also provides practical insights into enhancing solver performance under perceived task uncertainty and perceived competition uncertainty.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference99 articles.
1. Observe, innovate, succeed: a learning perspective on innovation and the performance of entrepreneurial chefs;Journal of Business Research,2016
2. Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation;Research Policy,2019
3. Acar, O. (2019b), “Why crowdsourcing often leads to bad ideas”, available at: https://hbr.org/2019/12/why-crowdsourcing-often-leads-to-bad-ideas (accessed 22 September 2021).
4. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search;Academy of Management Review,2012
5. Design crowdsourcing: the impact on new product performance of sourcing design solutions from the ‘crowd’;Journal of Marketing,2018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献