Effects of learning and uncertainty on crowdsourcing performance of solvers: insights from performance feedback theory

Author:

Ye Hua (Jonathan)ORCID

Abstract

PurposeIn crowdsourcing contests, the capabilities and performance of individual workers (solvers) determine whether seeker firms can obtain satisfactory solutions from the platform. It is noted that solvers may learn such skills in crowdsourcing from doing (experiential learning) or observing (vicarious learning). However, it remains unclear if such learning can be materialized into improved performance considering the unique settings of crowdsourcing contests. The study aims to understand how experiential learning and vicarious learning enhance solver performance and under what conditions.Design/methodology/approachThe model was tested using survey and archival data from 261 solvers on a large contest platform in China.FindingsResults support the premise that experiential learning and vicarious learning separately and jointly enhance solver performance. Moreover, perceived task uncertainty strengthens the effect of vicarious learning but weakens the effect of experiential learning, whereas perceived competition uncertainty weakens the effect of vicarious learning.Originality/valueThe current study enriches the understanding of the impacts of experiential learning and vicarious learning and offers a more nuanced understanding of the conditions under which solvers can reap the performance benefits from learning in crowdsourcing contests. The study also provides practical insights into enhancing solver performance under perceived task uncertainty and perceived competition uncertainty.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference99 articles.

1. Observe, innovate, succeed: a learning perspective on innovation and the performance of entrepreneurial chefs;Journal of Business Research,2016

2. Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation;Research Policy,2019

3. Acar, O. (2019b), “Why crowdsourcing often leads to bad ideas”, available at: https://hbr.org/2019/12/why-crowdsourcing-often-leads-to-bad-ideas (accessed 22 September 2021).

4. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search;Academy of Management Review,2012

5. Design crowdsourcing: the impact on new product performance of sourcing design solutions from the ‘crowd’;Journal of Marketing,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3