Abstract
PurposeAccurate information is the basis for well-informed decision-making, which is particularly challenging in the dynamic reality of a pandemic. Search engines are a major gateway for obtaining information, yet little is known about the quality and scientific accuracy of information answering conspiracy-related queries about COVID-19, especially outside of English-speaking countries and languages.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an algorithmic audit of Google Search, emulating search queries about COVID-19 conspiracy theories in 10 different locations and four languages (English, Arabic, Russian, and Hebrew) and used content analysis by native language speakers to examine the quality of the available information.FindingsSearching the same conspiracies in different languages led to fundamentally different results. English had the largest share of 52% high-quality scientific information. The average quality score of the English-language results was significantly higher than in Russian and Arabic. Non-English languages had a considerably higher percentage of conspiracy-supporting content. In Russian, nearly 40% of the results supported conspiracies compared to 18% in English.Originality/valueThis study’s findings highlight structural differences that significantly limit access to high-quality, balanced, and accurate information about the pandemic, despite its existence on the Internet in another language. Addressing these gaps has the potential to improve individual decision-making collective outcomes for non-English societies.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference90 articles.
1. Languages are still a major barrier to global science;PLoS Biology,2016
2. Medical conspiracy theories: cognitive science and implications for ethics;Medicine Health Care and Philosophy,2020
3. Private browsing does not affect Google personalization: an experimental evaluation,2023
4. Blinded by the lies? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories;Communication Theory,2021
5. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook;Science,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献