German valuation: review of methods and legal framework

Author:

Schnaidt Tobias,Sebastian Steffen

Abstract

PurposeThere is a continuing discussion about whether German valuation methods are inaccurate and inferior to the British standard, and the enduring efforts for a European and internationally standardised valuation method and value definitions intensify this discussion. The German valuation system is said to lead to valuations which do not reflect actual market conditions and excessive smoothing. Not surprisingly, German surveyors usually disagree and claim that the German valuation approach, with its sustainable rental value, fulfils not only its purpose but is more transparent and thus superior to the approach usually applied in UK. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the recently adjusted German valuation methods.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyses the German valuation methods and highlights the predominant differences to the British valuation standards.FindingsThe paper shows that the discussed valuation methods should lead to comparable results. The legal framework of the German valuation approaches can therefore not be blamed for any of the observed empirical phenomenon.Originality/valueThe paper discusses the recently adjusted German valuation methods.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference29 articles.

1. Altmeppen, H. and Brauer, F. (2009), “Den fair value fairer machen”, Immobilien & Finanzierung, Vol. 22, pp. 10‐12.

2. Crosby, N. (2007), “German open ended funds: was there a valuation problem?”, Working Paper in Real Estate & Planning 05/07, University of Reading, Reading.

3. Crosby, N., Lizieri, C. and McAllister, P. (2009), “Means, motive and opportunity? Disentangling client influence on performance measurement appraisals”, paper presented at the European Real Estate Society Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

4. Downie, M.L., Schulte, K.‐W. and Thomas, M. (1996), “Germany”, in Adair, A., Downie, M.L., McGreal, S. and Vos, G. (Eds), European Valuation Practice, Theory and Techniques, E & FN Spon, London.

5. Engel, R. (2002), “Das Aus für die DCF‐methode?”, Grundstücksmarkt und Grundstückswert, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 321‐32.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3