Powerless positions, silenced voices? – critical views on health and social care management

Author:

Hujala Anneli,Laulainen Sanna,Lindberg Kajsa

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide background to this special issue and consider how critically oriented research can be applied to health and social care management. Design/methodology/approach – Basic principles of critical management studies are introduced briefly to frame subsequent papers in this issue. Findings – In order to identify the wicked problems and darker sides of the care field, there is a need to study things in alternative ways through critical lenses. Giving a voice to those in less powerful positions may result in redefinition and redesign of conventional roles and agency of patients, volunteers and professionals and call into question the taken-for-granted understanding of health and social care management. Originality/value – The special issue as a whole was designed to enhance critical approaches to the discussion in the field of health and social care. This editorial hopefully raises awareness of CMS and serves as an opening for further discussion on critical views in the research on management and organization in this field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference72 articles.

1. Adler, P.S. , Forbes, L.C. and Willmott, H. (2007), “Critical management studies”, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 119-179.

2. Alvesson, M. and Ashcraft, K.L. (2009), “Critical methodology in management and organization research”, in Buchanan, D.A. and Bryman, A. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Sage, London, pp. 61-77.

3. Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2000), “Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: challenges, responses, consequences”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 134-156.

4. Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2012), “Generating research questions through problematization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 247-271.

5. Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2009), Reflexive Methodology. New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Sage, London.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3