Abstract
PurposeIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020–2022, the immutable and fragmented character of our healthcare system changed. Healthcare professionals and their institutional leads proved remarkably agile and managed to change toward collaborative care. The purpose of this paper is to examine experiences with collaborative practice in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in two regions in the Netherlands, to explore and understand the relationship between policy and practice and the potential development of new collaborative care routines.Design/methodology/approachUsing a methodology informed by theories that have a focus on professional working practice (so called “activity theory”) or the institutional decision-makers (discursive institutionalism), respectively, the perspective of physicians on the relationship between policy and practice was explored. Transcripts of meetings with physicians from different institutions and medical specialities about their collaborative COVID-19 care were qualitatively analysed.FindingsThe findings show how change during COVID-19 was primarily initiated from the bottom-up. Cultural-cognitive and normative forces in professional, collaborative working practice triggered the creation of new relationships and sharing of resources and capacity. The importance of top-down regulatory forces from institutional leads was less evident. Yet, both (bottom-up) professional legitimacy and (top-down) institutional support are mentioned as necessary by healthcare professionals to develop and sustain new collaborative routines.Practical implicationsThe COVID-19 crisis provided opportunity to build better healthcare infrastructure by learning from the responses to this pandemic. Now is the time to find ways to integrate new ways of working initiated from the bottom-up with those longstanding ones initiated from top-down.OriginalityThis paper presents a combination of theories for understanding collaboration in healthcare, which can inform future research into collaborative care initiatives.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)
Reference40 articles.
1. Sociological and organisational theories of professions and professionalism,2016
2. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process;International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,2009
3. Rapid, bottom-up design of a regional learning health system in response to COVID-19;Mayo Clinic Proceedings,2021
4. Blacker, F. (2009), “Cultural-historical activity theory and organization studies”, in Sannino, A., Daniels, H. and Gutierrez, K.D. (Eds), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.