Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to analyse the concept of a fair balance between conflicting fundamental rights in the context of intermediary liability for third party copyright infringement.
Design/methodology/approach
– European Legal Method.
Findings
– Fair balance is the appropriate conflict resolution mechanism in cases of fundamental rights clashes. Balancing is in essence a call for rational judicial deliberation. In intermediary liability, balancing excludes the imposition of filtering obligations on intermediaries for the purpose of copyright enforcement, but allows blocking.
Originality/value
– An in-depth look at a complicated, vague and underdeveloped area of law with significant practical effect.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference50 articles.
1. Alexy, R.
(2002),
A Theory of Constitutional Rights
, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Alexy, R.
(2003), “Constitutional rights, balancing and rationality”,
Ratio Juris
, Vol. 16 No. 2.
3. Alexy, R.
(2005), “Balancing, constitutional review, and representation”,
International Journal of Constitutional Law
, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 572-581.
4. Angelopoulos, C.
(2013), “Beyond the safe harbours: harmonising substantive intermediary liability for copyright infringement in Europe”,
Intellectual Property Quarterly
, Vol. 2013 No. 3, pp. 253-274.
5. Angelopoulos, C.
(2014), “Are blocking injunctions against ISPs allowed in Europe?: copyright enforcement in the Post-Telekabel EU legal landscape”,
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
, Vol. 9 No. 10, pp. 812-821.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献