Author:
Zhao Feng,Tian Jiahe,Duan Yuchen
Abstract
PurposeThe neo-Kaleckian model follows the ideas of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki, that investment is a key influencing factor in the dynamics of the capitalist mode of production. Through the discussion of different forms of investment decision function, this paper constructs the analysis framework of wage-led and profit-led economic growth regimes.Design/methodology/approachThe model has become an important theoretical paradigm for current Western heterodox economists regarding the research on the impact of functional income distribution on economic growth, and it has a very large impact on both theoretical and empirical research. Starting from Marx's reproduction theory, this article discusses the theoretical shortcomings of the neo-Kaleckian growth regime model.FindingsThis paper mainly focuses on three aspects: (1) the ideological legacy of “Smith's Dogma”; (2) neglecting the restrictions on income distribution from the organic composition of capital and the surplus value rate; (3) technological progress and the formation of a new long economic wave.Originality/valueThe authors believe that the neo-Kaleckian model unilaterally emphasizes the demand-side factors in the economy and, unconsciously or not, ignores the role of the supply-side, which makes it encounter certain limitations in explaining long-term growth. Even if some empirical conclusions are employed to bridge functional income distribution and technological progress, there is still a lack of a theoretical basis for accurately describing long-term economic changes using this model. In order to better promote high-quality economic development and accelerate the formation of a new pattern of economic development in which the domestic large-scale cycle is the mainstay and the domestic and international double cycles promote each other, the authors need to adopt a policy combination with the supply-side as the main and the demand-side as the supplement, and to work from both sides.
Reference41 articles.
1. Notes on capacity utilisation, distribution and accumulation;Contributions to Political Economy,1986
2. Basu, D. and Budhiraja, M. (2020), “What to make of the Kaldor-Verdoorn law?”, available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1288&context=econ_workingpaper (accessed 29 March 2021).
3. Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies;Cambridge Journal of Economics,1990
4. Boyer, R. (1988), “Formalizing growth regimes”, in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London and New York, pp. 608-630.
5. Caldentey, E.P. and Vernengo, M. (2013), “Wage and profit-led growth: the limits to neo-Kaleckian models and a Kaldorian proposal”, available at: http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_775.pdf (accessed 25 March 2021).