Abstract
Purpose
Surveys measuring consumers’ preferences for sustainable food might suffer from socially desirable responding. Social desirability stems in part from social norms about sustainable lifestyles, when respondents need approval from others and when privacy is not guaranteed during survey completion. While various studies showed this phenomenon through laboratory experiments and by comparing different modes of survey administration, no research adopted factorial survey experiments (FSEs) to measure which factors are perceived by consumers as critical for socially desirable answering. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap, at least for young consumers in a case study with organic fruit.
Design/methodology/approach
In total, 143 under-30 respondents were involved in an FSE. Each respondent evaluated six hypothetical scenarios (n=858) describing a consumer surveyed about his/her preferences for organic fruit. Respondents indicated whether they believed participants would have answered honestly or not to the survey described in each scenario. Generalized linear mixed models were used to model how scenario attributes were perceived to influence honest answering.
Findings
Respondents believe that people are more prone to bias their answers the more they seek approval from others. Moreover, the presence of acquaintances during survey completion is another critical driver of survey misreporting.
Originality/value
This study, by using a novel robust quasi-experimental approach, confirms that social desirability could lead consumers to misreport their preferences when surveyed about an organic fruit. This confirms that well-designed surveys, adopting proper remedies for social desirability should be adopted even for those food products, like fruit, which are usually deemed to be less subjected to misreporting. It also introduces FSEs as a flexible tool for collecting insights from consumers about potential antecedents of their behavior.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference77 articles.
1. Abeler, J., Nosenzo, D. and Raymond, C. (2016), “Preferences for truth-telling”, Econometrica, available at: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=035082020017064121028110026108071073062005049007084090076020117111094072090087107072053057049122058038019122000089065025103066016009043022084016122123093084122109005052011095071117076098121127106119029119024065008001000065024006094005113121126070000&EXT=pdf
2. Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling;Journal of Management,2013
3. Affective beliefs influence the experience of eating meat;PloS One,2016
4. Research on fair trade consumption – a review;Journal of Business Ethics,2012
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献