Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how the family firm identity is affected when it is no longer publicly communicated.Design/methodology/approachA case study approach was used to follow a third-generation family business, a large Swedish home electronics firm that acquired a competitor and, initially, continued using its family firm identity after the acquisition. This study longitudinally tracks the company and its owning family using archival data combined with interviews.FindingsThe case company decided to stop communicating their identity as a family business. Such a move initially appears counterintuitive, since it potentially threatens the family firm identity and leads the firm to forgo other advantages, e.g. in branding. However, the decision was based on arguments that were rational from a business perspective, leading to a decoupling of family and firm identity.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by showing a decoupling of internally experienced and externally communicated identities. It further contributes to the understanding of the family firm identity concept.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference93 articles.
1. Leveraging the corporate brand;California Management Review,2004
2. Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. (1985), “Organizational identity”, Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, pp. 263-295, JAI Press.
3. ‘We are a family firm’: an exploration of the motives for communicating the family business brand;Journal of Family Business Management,2018
4. Branding the family firm: a review, integrative framework proposal, and research agenda;Journal of Family Business Strategy,2018
5. Corporate heritage identities, corporate heritage brands and the multiple heritage identities of the British monarchy;European Journal of Marketing,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献