What do engagement measures really mean?

Author:

Baron Angela

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to discuss how and with what employees engage at work. It seeks to offer an explanation of “locus of engagement” – what aspects of their work individuals engage with to a lesser or greater extent – and “emotional” and “transactional” engagement – demonstrating that people can engage at different levels, both of which might result in performance but also in very different behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on research completed for CIPD by The Kingston Engagement Consortium drawing on both quantative and qualitative data collected from member companies over a six‐year period of study.FindingsThe paper argues that managers need a deeper understanding of how employees are engaging with their work to effectively leverage performance through engagement. It finds that despite much work on engagement, the issues of with what and at what level people are engaging is still relatively unexplored. It also finds that how and with what people engage can have implications for their performance and other behavior which will impact on the success of the organization.Originality/valueThis has practical implications for managers and demonstrates that engagement surveys alone will not give sufficient information to enable them to manage engagement effectively.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference8 articles.

1. CIPD (2011a), “Locus of engagement: understanding what employees connect with at work”, Kingston Engagement Consortium research, CIPD, May 2011.

2. CIPD (2011b), “Management Competencies for Enhancing Employee Engagement”, CIPD Research Insight, March 2011.

3. CIPD (2012), “Emotional or transactional engagement – does it matter?”, CIPD Research Insight, May 2011.

4. Huber, W.H. and Glick, G.B. (1993), “Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test of two configurational theories”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1196‐250.

5. McLeod, D. and Clarke, N. (2009), “Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement”, a report to Government, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3