Academic entrepreneurship

Author:

Brennan Michael C.,Wall Anthony P.,McGowan Pauric

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the paper was to investigate entrepreneurship in a university setting and in particular amongst university managers, established academic entrepreneurs and nascent academic entrepreneurs. The purpose was to better understand the enablers and barriers to entrepreneurship taking place.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative, sense‐making methodology was used involving a single case method and a purposeful sampling approach. A three‐stage design strategy consisted of: identification of key themes by questioning university policy makers, managers and academic entrepreneurs; development of a questionnaire to profile academic entrepreneurs; and use of the questionnaire to assess preferences amongst nascent academic entrepreneursFindingsFour types of academic entrepreneur (hero, maverick, broker and prospector) were identified based on different approaches by individual academics to the use/production of discipline knowledge and the nature of their relationship with the host university.Research limitations/implicationsThe single case research is perceived as a limitation. Future studies will involve refining the level of analysis in terms of different disciplines and institutions.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that interventions to promote entrepreneurship within universities ought to consider different strategies in order to take account of preferences amongst nascent entrepreneurs.Originality/valueThe paper looks at entrepreneurship in universities from a corporate perspective rather than from an individual perspective. The powerful influence of the university organisational setting is therefore recognised in terms of the creation of enablers and barriers to academic entrepreneurship taking place.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D. (2003), “Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 7‐24.

2. Askling, B., Henkel, M. and Kehm, B. (2001), “Concepts of knowledge and their organisation in universities”, European Journal of Education, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 341‐50.

3. Autio, E. (1997), “New technology‐based firms in innovation networks”, in Jones‐Evans, D. and Klofsten, M. (Eds), Technology Innovation and Enterprise: the European Experience, Macmillan, London, pp. 209‐35.

4. Birley, S. (2002), “Universities, academics, and spinout companies: lessons from Imperial”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 133‐53.

5. Blacker, F. (1995), “Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation”, Organisation Studies, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 1021‐46.

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3