A conceptual framework for the Basel accords-based regulation

Author:

Mohammed Ahmed Jaffar

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a theoretical model for banking regulation in relation to Basel accords implementation. As a risk manager practitioner at a financial institution and in-charge of Basel implementation in a Basel accords environment of banking regulation, the author has been intrigued by the theoretical basis of the design of Basel accords. The objective was to investigate a theoretical model in the literature according to which the accords were designed. In case of deficiency in the literature of this model, the author seeks to provide a juxtaposition to the theoretical model that explains the accords adoption and implementation by regulators. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a review of existing literature. Findings – After reviewing of public interest theory, cultural theory, administration theory and the new-institutionalism theory, the author found little application of these theories to the capital-based regulation, particularly in relation to Basel 2 accord. There is deficiency in the literature of a conceptual theoretical framework based on which the author can explain the adoption of Basel accords. The author has provided a theoretical model that links these theories to the practice of banking regulation. This paper found deficiencies in theories of how banks should be regulated as compared to several theories that explains why banks are regulated. Originality/value – After reviewing of public interest theory, cultural theory, administration theory and the new-institutionalism theory, the author found little application of these theories to the capital-based regulation, particularly in relation to Basel 2 accord. There is deficiency in the literature of a conceptual theoretical framework based on which the author can explain the adoption of Basel accords. The author has provided a theoretical model that links these theories to the practice of banking regulation. This paper found deficiencies in theories of how banks should be regulated as compared to several theories that explains why banks are regulated.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference41 articles.

1. Akerlof, G.A. (1970), “The markets for ‘â€∼Lemons’’: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism”. Quarterly Journal of Economics , Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 488-500.

2. Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (2012), Understanding Regulation , Oxford University Press, Oxford.

3. Barnett, E. and Casper, M. (2001), “A definition of ‘social environment’”, American Journal of Public Health , Vol. 3 No. 91, p. 465.

4. Baumol, W. (1977), Economic Theory and Operations Analysis , (4th ed.), Prentice Hall.

5. BCBS (2004), Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement And Capital Standards: A Revised Framework , Bank for International Settlements, Basel.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Restoring trust after banks crisis: the Israeli case study;Israel Affairs;2022-04-22

2. Consumer Protection and Market Regulations in Solomon Islands and Fiji, Comparative Analysis;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2022

3. Basel III in India: a double-edged sword;Qualitative Research in Financial Markets;2021-07-24

4. Investigating trust in the Israeli banking system from the reciprocating perspectives of customers and bankers: a mixed methods study;International Journal of Bank Marketing;2021-01-21

5. Consumer Protection and Market Regulations in Solomon Islands and Fiji, Comparative Analysis;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3