A subject specialist-centric model for library resources management in academic libraries

Author:

Chen Mingyue,Makani Joyline,Bliemel Michael

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze factors affecting decision-making on libraries’ electronic resources management under the situation of tight budgets in Canadian research universities. Design/methodology/approach Interview was adopted to investigate library resources management leaders’ opinions from English-speaking university members of the Group of Canadian Research University Libraries. Findings A comprehensive model is developed for library resources’ management. Subject specialists are the key of the model integrating marketing roles and evaluation roles. Research limitations/implications The main limitations of this study are the small sample size of interview candidates, which may have application limitations on other types of libraries and universities in different areas. Practical implications This study generates a comprehensive model based on past research, contributing to future library decision-making practices. Originality/value It develops a subject specialist-centric model of library resources’ value assessment and brings the element of culture into future studies of academic library.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference25 articles.

1. The winds of change;Library Journal,2013

2. Canadian Association of Research Libraries (2012), “Canadian Association of Research Libraries 2012 annual report”, available at: www.carl-abrc.ca/uploads/Publications/2012-CARL%20Annual%20Report.pdf (01 August 2014).

3. Measuring the economic value of special libraries;Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances,2007

4. Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (2014), “About counter”, available at: http://projectcounter.org/ (accessed 25 August, 2014).

5. Dwyer, M. (2014), “University rankings 2015: methodology”, Macleans’ Magzine, available at: www.macleans.ca/education/unirankings/university-rankings-2015-methodology/ (accessed 23 October 2015).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Library management models: a review and direction for future research;Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication;2024-02-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3