Abstract
Purpose
– The convergence of librarianship and information science to form library and information science (LIS) is seen as a recent phenomenon, with the term “information science” originally focused on the application of computers to library operations and services. LIS as a science and multidisciplinary field applies the practice and perspective of information with the aim of answering important questions related to the activities of a target group. As a science, LIS is more than a collection of facts to be memorised or techniques to be mastered but is instead an inquiry carried out by people who raise questions for which answers are unknown and who have gained confidence in their ability to reach conclusions, albeit tentative ones, through research, experiment and careful thought sharpened by the open criticism of others. What is described here is a dynamic and changing field of study called LIS which differs from Cronin
'
s (2004) conclusion that library science or LIS is neither a science nor a discipline. Like any other science, LIS continues to emerge, evolve, transform and dissipate in the ongoing conversation of disciplines.
Design/methodology/approach
– To understand LIS, this paper thoroughly reviewed the literature by paying attention to the genesis of the terms “information”, “documentation”, “science” and “librarianship”, and then the interdisciplinary nature of library science and information science.
Findings
– The differences between librarianship and information science are an indication that there are two different fields in a strong interdisciplinary relation, rather than one being a special case of the other. LIS has grown to be a scientific discipline, knowledge and a process that allows abandoning or modifying previously accepted conclusions when confronted with more complete or reliable experimental or observational evidence. Therefore, like any other science, LIS is a science and discipline in its own right that continues to emerge, evolve, transform and dissipate in the ongoing conversation of disciplines.
Originality/value
– What is described here is a dynamic and changing field of study and a science called LIS that differs from Cronin
'
s (2004) assessment that library science or LIS is neither a science nor a discipline. The originality of the paper is rooted in a growing discussion to understand the relevance and appreciate the continued existence of LIS as a science and a field of study.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Abbott, A.
(1988),
The System of the Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
2. Arms, W.Y.
(2005), “Information science as a liberal art”,
Interlending and Document Supply
, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 81-84. doi:10.1108/02641610510700188
3. Aspray, W.
(1999), “Command and control, documentation and library science: The origins of information science at the University of Pittsburgh”,
Annals of the History of Computing, IEEE
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 4-20. doi: 10.1109/85.801528
4. Auld, L.W.S.
(1992), “The fourth quarter century: a personal reminiscence”, in
Allen, W.C.
and
Delzell, R.F.
, , (Eds),
Ideals and Standards: The History of the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1893-1993
, Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, pp. 36-56, available at: www.archive.org/details/idealsstandardsh00alle
5. Bates, M.J.
(1999), “The invisible substrate of information science”,
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
, Vol. 50 No. 12, pp. 1043-1050.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献