Author:
McGovern Seamus M.,Gupta Surendra M.
Abstract
Purpose
– There is a rich body of literature on sequencing assembly and on sequencing disassembly, but little that either fuses or contrasts the two, which may be valuable for long-range planning in the closed-loop supply chain and simply convenient in terms of consistency in nomenclature and mathematical formulations. The purpose of this paper is to concisely unify and summarize assembly and disassembly formulae – as well as to add new formulations for completeness – and then demonstrate the similarities and differences between assembly and disassembly.
Design/methodology/approach
– Along with several familiar assembly-line formulae which are adapted here for disassembly, five (two specific and three general) metrics and a comparative performance formula from disassembly-line balancing are proposed for use in assembly- and disassembly-line sequencing and balancing either directly, through generalization, or with some extension. The size of assembly and disassembly search spaces are also quantified and formulated. Three new metrics are then developed from each of the general metrics to demonstrate the process of using these general formulae as prototypes.
Findings
– The three new metrics along with several of the original metrics are selectively applied to a simple, notional case study product to be sequenced on an assembly line and then on a disassembly line. Using these analytical results, the inherent differences between assembly and disassembly, even for a seemingly trivial product, are illustrated.
Originality/value
– The research adds several new assembly/disassembly metrics, a case study, unifies the evaluation formulae that assembly and disassembly hold in common as well as structuring prototype formulae for flexibility in generating new evaluation criteria for both, and quantifies (using the case study) how assembly and disassembly – while certainly possessing similarities – also demonstrate measurable differences that can be expected to affect product design, planning, production, and end-of-life processing.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference21 articles.
1. Battaïa, O.
and
Dolgui, A.
(2013), “A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solution approaches”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 142 No. 2, pp. 259-277.
2. Boysen, N.
,
Fliedner, M.
and
Scholl, A.
(2008), “Assembly line balancing: which model to use when?”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 111 No. 2, pp. 509-528.
3. Brennan, L.
,
Gupta, S.M.
and
Taleb, K.N.
(1994), “Operations planning issues in an assembly/disassembly environment”,
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
, Vol. 14 No. 9, pp. 57-67.
4. Elsayed, E.A.
and
Boucher, T.O.
(1994),
Analysis and Control of Production Systems
, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. Finch, B.
(2008),
Operations Now: Supply Chain Profitability and Performance
, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献