Author:
Barbarossa Camilla,Pastore Alberto
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to address the green purchasing gap by: exploring environmentally conscious consumers’ mental representation of the barriers responsible for the green purchasing gap; assessing which barriers are perceived as the most relevant in hampering the purchase of green products for environmentally conscious consumers; and investigating the relationships among these barriers. Although consumers are increasingly concerned about environmental deterioration, the current market share of green products remains fairly low.
Design/methodology/approach
– An introspective qualitative study is conducted; 51 environmentally conscious consumers showing a green purchasing gap are interviewed, and the data are analysed with a cognitive mapping technique (Decision Explorer software) and Freeman’ structural indices (UCINET software).
Findings
– Higher price and scarce availability of green products are the main barriers to green purchasing. However, consumers’ perceptions of price and availability may vary by changing other barriers (e.g. green products displacement inside the store and in-store communication).
Originality/value
– This work reconstructs the decisional premises of environmentally conscious consumers’ choices to not purchase green products, identifies the most relevant barriers to green purchasing behaviour and the relationships between these barriers. With this knowledge, marketers of green products can focus on the most important barriers so that interventions in these barriers may change environmentally conscious consumers’ perceptions of other related barriers.
Reference52 articles.
1. Ahmad, R.
and
Ali, N.A.
(2003), “The use of cognitive mapping technique in management research: theory and practice”,
Management Research News
, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 1-16.
2. Axelrod, R.
(1976),
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Borgatti, S.P.
,
Everett, M.G.
and
Freeman, L.C.
(2002),
UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis
, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
4. Boulstridge, E.
and
Carrigan, M.
(2000), “Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap”,
Journal of Communication Management
, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 355-368.
5. Bray, J.
,
Johns, N.
and
Kilburn, D.
(2011), “An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption”,
Journal of Business Ethics
, Vol. 98 No. 4, pp. 597-608.
Cited by
108 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献