Toward a definition of digital object reuse

Author:

Kenfield Ayla Stein,Woolcott Liz,Thompson Santi,Kelly Elizabeth Joan,Shiri Ali,Muglia Caroline,Masood Kinza,Chapman Joyce,Jefferson Derrick,Morales Myrna E.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present conceptual definitions for digital object use and reuse. Typically, assessment of digital repository content struggles to go beyond traditional usage metrics such as clicks, views or downloads. This is problematic for galleries, libraries, archives, museums and repositories (GLAMR) practitioners because use assessment does not tell a nuanced story of how users engage with digital content and objects. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews prior research and literature aimed at defining use and reuse of digital content in GLAMR contexts and builds off of this group’s previous research to devise a new model for defining use and reuse called the use-reuse matrix. Findings This paper presents the use-reuse matrix, which visually represents eight categories and numerous examples of use and reuse. Additionally, the paper explores the concept of “permeability” and its bearing on the matrix. It concludes with the next steps for future research and application in the development of the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). Practical implications The authors developed this model and definitions to inform D-CRAFT, an Institute of Museum and Library Services National Leadership Grant project. This toolkit is being developed to help practitioners assess reuse at their own institutions. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is one of the first to propose distinct definitions that describe and differentiate between digital object use and reuse in the context of assessing digital collections and data.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,Information Systems

Reference56 articles.

1. Reporting practices of institutional repositories: analysis of responses from two surveys;Journal of Library Administration,2018

2. Borschke, M. (2017), “This is not a remix: piracy, authenticity and popular music”, Bloomsbury Academic, available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501318955?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyPopularMusic

3. Developing standards for emerging forms of assessment: the NISO altmetrics initiative;The Serials Librarian,2016

4. The philosophy of the limit, systems theory and feminist legal reform symposium on feminist critical legal studies and postmodernism: part one: a diversity of influence;New England Law Review,1991

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3