Opinion paper: Is national planning for acquisitions and document supply still valid?

Author:

Line Maurice B.

Abstract

The time when every country needed to plan its own acquisitions and document supply system may be over. For purposes of consultation, it is most convenient for users to have wanted items that are not available locally in one large collection, though this runs into political and other difficulties. Co‐operative acquisition systems rarely work. Remote consultation of digitised material would change this situation. It is now usually as fast to obtain “copiable” items from foreign countries as from one’s own, even when they have to be supplied by paper copies; and more and more items are accessible on the Internet. For books, the time taken to supply and the cost still vary considerably between domestic and other sources; there is no easy solution unless and until large amounts of material are digitised, and then remote supply and remote consultation begin to merge. As a result of the various factors, there is now no need for national acquisition and supply policies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. Chapman, A. (2000), “Revealing the invisible: the need for retrospective conversion in the virtual future”, Alexandria, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 33‐43.

2. Collins, J. and Finer, J. (1982), National Acquisition Policies and Systems: A Comparative Study of Existing Systems and Possible Models, IFLA International Office for UAP, Wetherby.

3. Henty, M. (1995), “Resource sharing ideals and realities: the case of Australia’s distributed national collection”, Advances in Collection Development and Sharing, Vol. 1, pp. 139‐52.

4. Line, M.B. (1979), “National interlending systems: existing systems and possible models”, Interlending Review, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 42‐6.

5. Line, M.B. (1988), “Acquisition policies: local, national and international”, in Menkes, V. (Ed.), The Eternal Triangle, Proceedings of the National Acquisitions Group second annual conference held in York, 1987, NAG, London, pp. 81‐8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3