Author:
Wu Jyh‐Jeng,Huei Wang Shan
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore whether sellers can create extra profit through information premiums. Phenomena surrounding asymmetrical information transmission among buyers is also explored..Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses three experimental designs to manipulate asymmetrical information acquisition among buyers (including insiders and outsiders) by exploring the related effects in online auctions. Questionnaires are used to collect the final willing‐to‐pay auction prices for buyers in each situation. The analyses are performed with SPSS software, using paired t‐tests and ANCOVA analysis.FindingsInformation premiums between insiders and outsiders are significantly different under diverse manipulative factors. ANCOVA shows a significant relationship in information traits, information acquisition costs, brand signals and information premiums among buyers.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper employs a highly‐involved design and only considers one product category: MP3 players; other types of products are not included.Practical implicationsThe results show that sellers can create extra profit through information traits, information acquired cost, and brand signals; results are from the asymmetrical information transmission process among buyers.Originality/valueThis research is one of the first that attempts to explore the asymmetrical information transmission process and effects among buyers in online auctions.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference53 articles.
1. Akerlof, G.A. (1970), “The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 488‐500.
2. Anderson, S. and Renault, R. (1999), “Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: a Bertrand‐Chamberlin‐Diamond model”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 719‐35.
3. Banerjee, P. (2005), “Common value auctions with asymmetric bidder information”, Economics Letters, Vol. 88, pp. 47‐53.
4. Bapna, R., Goes, P. and Gupta, A. (2000), “A theoretical and empirical investigation of multi‐item online auctions”, Information of Technology Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1‐23.
5. Bates, M.J. (2007), “What is browsing – really? A model drawing from behavioural science research”, Information Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, Paper 330.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献