The information systems balancing act: building partnerships and infrastructure

Author:

Brown Carol V.,Ross Jeanne W.

Abstract

Describes how IS (information systems) units are currently applying balancing mechanisms to help them address the limitations of organizational structure. IS units require organizational structures that both facilitate partnerships with business unit clients and enable tight co‐ordination of computing platforms to strengthen the technology infrastructure. For years, IS executives have recognized that the structure that best supports each objective is counterproductive for the other objective. Thus, they have periodically undertaken major restructuring, which has the effect of alternating between the objectives rather than addressing them simultaneously. Today’s IS executives, however, are increasingly attempting to achieve partnership and infrastructure development simultaneously by implementing balancing mechanisms: structural overlays and process enhancements that leverage the strengths of an existing organizational structure while compensating for its limitations. Balancing mechanisms enable the IS function to work towards those dual IS management goals simultaneously, as well as to respond more quickly to today’s competitive environment. Also describes individual balancing mechanisms used in Fortune 500 firms and a strategy for implementing suites of mechanisms to achieve IS management goals.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference11 articles.

1. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1990, “Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind”, Harvard Business Review, July‐August, pp. 138‐45.

2. Ciborra, C.U. and Lanzara, G.F. 1994, “Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations”, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 61‐86.

3. Davenport, T. and Linder, J. 1993, “Information management infrastructure: the new competitive weapon?”, Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation Working Paper CITA33, October.

4. Galbraith, J.R. 1973, Designing Complex Organizations, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

5. Henderson, J.C. 1990, “Plugging into strategic partnerships: the critical IS connection”, Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 7‐18.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3