Claimants’ views on total and permanent disability insurance claims

Author:

Black Margaret Elizabeth,Matthews Lynda Roslyn,Millington Michael J.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate Australian claimants’ experience of the total and permanent disability (TPD) insurance claims process and documents their recommendations for improvement.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative methodology was used. In all, 12 claimants with finalized TPD claims were recruited via their superannuation fund. Data collected from in-depth interviews were thematically analyzed and reported using the COREQ checklist. Extracts from verbatim transcription were included to represent the claimant without bias.FindingsMost interviewees described a flawed claims process in which important information was withheld or unclear, procedures were complicated and arduous, communication was poor and frequent need for “chasing up” was frustrating. The claims process undermined the well-being of many interviewees at a critical time in their adjustment to disability. Lump sum payment yielded unexpected consequences for ten interviewees. Some interviewees retained a desire to work despite serious disability.Research limitations/implicationsThe use of purposive sampling means that findings may not represent the experience of all claimants with finalized TPD claims. Saturation of knowledge was reached despite the relatively small number of in-depth interviews conducted. In the absence of previous research, this study identifies areas of concern in the TPD claimant experience and posits a set of important claimant issues for further investigation.Practical implicationsA person-centred approach is needed. Claimants would benefit from introduction of clear process information, a single point-of-contact throughout claim, advocacy/support and rehabilitation.Originality/valueThis inaugural study provides an understanding of challenges faced by TPD claimants. All interviewees provided suggestions for improvement in the TPD claims process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance

Reference46 articles.

1. Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (2014), “Insurance administration expenses”, available at: www.superannuation.asn.au/media-release-28-august-2014 (accessed 15 October 2016).

2. Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2011), “Realising the health benefits of work: position statement”, available at: www.racp.edu.au/page/afoem-health-benefits-of-work (accessed 18 January 2018).

3. Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (2017), “AIST: who are we?”, available at: www.aist.asn.au/about/who-are-we.aspx (accessed 10 Februray 2018).

4. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2017), “Total and permanent disability cover”, available at: www.moneysmart.gov.au/insurance/life-insurance/total-and-permanent-disability-cover (accessed 24 November 2017).

5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2018), “Financial counselling: help with your finances”, available at: www.moneysmart.gov.au/managing-your-money/managing-debts/financial-counselling (accessed 10 January 2018).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3