Creating sustainable health care systems

Author:

Littlejohns Peter,Kieslich Katharina,Weale Albert,Tumilty Emma,Richardson Georgina,Stokes Tim,Gauld Robin,Scuffham Paul

Abstract

Purpose In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process. Design/methodology/approach Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach. Findings A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool. Research limitations/implications The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience. Practical implications All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges. Social implications This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges. Originality/value No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference70 articles.

1. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice;Health Policy,2007

2. Public deliberation in health policy and bioethics: mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field;Journal of Public Deliberation,2013

3. Social values and healthcare priority-setting in Korea;Journal of Health Organization and Management,2012

4. Social value judgements in healthcare: a philosophical critique;Journal of Health Organization and Management,2012

5. Public participation: more than a method?: Comment on ‘Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens’ juries;International Journal of Health Policy and Management,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3