Business models for open access journals publishing

Author:

Chi Chang Chen

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to summarise the information about open access publishing models and to analyse the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT).Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a review of the academic literature, to conduct a comprehensive SWOT analysis and adopt the multiple case study approach to analyse the open access publishing model.FindingsUseful results include the findings that the success factors of open access business models are: creating savings in publishing costs, increasing incomes, adoption of innovative technologies and controlling the quality of journals. The open access publishing model makes the research permanently visible and accessible, with sustainable development.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the findings may be applicable to open access journals for reasons other than impact factor, further research would be required to confirm this.Originality/valueThis study provides results that may enhance one's understanding of the open access publishing model, allowing both the reader and the author to benefit from it. Open access publishing leads to wider dissemination of information and greater advances in science.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference46 articles.

1. Albanese, A. (2003), “Open access gains with PLoS launch: scientists call for cell press boycott; Harvard balks on big deal”, Library Journal, 15 November, pp. 18‐19.

2. Association of Research Libraries (2005), “Monograph and serial costs in ARL libraries, 1986‐2004”, available at: www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/graphs/2004/monser04.pdf.

3. Atkinson, R. (2003), “Six key issues about the crisis in scholarly communications”, December 18, available at: www.library.cornell.edu/scholarlycomm/issues.html.

4. Bioline International (2006), “The Bioline EPrints Archive”, available at: http://bioline.utsc.utoronto.ca/.

5. BioMed Central (2006), “Frequently asked questions about BioMed Central's article‐processing charges”, available at: www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/apcfaq.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3