Author:
Ramalho Correia Ana Maria,Carlos Teixeira José
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the continuous evolution of scholarly publishing and knowledge communication as a result of the internet revolution.Design/methodology/approachInformation was obtained from a literature review of the main contributions on “self‐archiving” – the broad term often applied to electronic publishing of author‐supplied documents on the web without commercial publisher mediation. The paper analyses the impact of the open access movement, which came to fruition after the OAI Metadata Harvesting Protocol was established, as it creates the potential for interoperability between e‐print repositories. It concludes by outlining the challenges for information managers in developing the full potential of open access.FindingsWith regard to the future of self‐archiving, particularly in relation to peer‐reviewed journals, information managers have a very important role to perform within their organization.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the benefits of publishing in e‐print repositories for authors and their institutions. It points to the roles and responsibilities of information managers, primarily within academic and research institutions, in devising clear institutional policies and assisting users to self archive their papers for the benefit of their own organizations and the global scientific community.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference60 articles.
1. Antelman, K. (2004), “Do open‐access articles have a greater research impact?”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 372‐82, available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002309/01/do_open_access_CRL.pdf.
2. Bachrach, S., Berry, R.S., Blume, M., von Foerster, T., Fowler, A., Ginsparg, P., Heller, S., Kestner, N., Odlyzko, A., Okerson, A., Wigington, R. and Moffat, A. (1998), “Intellectual property: who should own scientific papers”, Science, Vol. 281 No. 5382, pp. 1459‐60, available at: www.sciencemag.org/ cgi/content/full/281/5382/1459.
3. Bosc, H. (2005), La communication scientifique revue et corrigé para l'Internet, INRA/UMR, available at: www.tours.inra.fr/prc/internet/documentation/communication_scientifique/comsci.htm.
4. Bot, M. and Burgemeester, J. (1998), Costing Model for Publishing an Electronic Journal, Price Waterhouse Coopers, Utrecht.
5. Boyce, P. (2000), “For better or for worse: preprints are here to stay”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 404‐714.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献