Author:
Arcand Manon,Nantel Jacques,Arles‐Dufour Mathieu,Vincent Anne
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to study the impact of reading a web site's privacy statement on the perceptions of control over privacy and trust in a cyber merchant.Design/methodology/approachTwo experiments were designed to monitor the actual reading of the privacy statement. Study one compares the influence of actual reading with self‐reported claims. Study two manipulated the format of the privacy statement (opt‐in or opt‐out) and included a control condition to assess the influence of the presence of a privacy statement and the influence of the format on the dependent variables.FindingsThe findings show that the mere presence of a privacy statement has a positive influence on perceived control. However, reading the privacy statement does not necessarily have a positive influence on perceived control and trust, contrary to commonly held assumptions. Participants who read the opt‐in format felt significantly more control and trust than the participants who read the opt‐out format. The opt‐out format decreases perceived control compared with the group that did not read the privacy statement when it was available.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample size for both experiments was relatively modest, which limits the generalisability of the findings.Practical implicationsCyber merchants should devote particular attention to the strategic role of the format of the privacy statement.Originality/valueIn contrast to other studies that relied on surveys, this paper assesses the impact of the actual reading of the privacy statement via an experimental approach. Moreover, the impact of the format of the privacy statement has been empirically tested.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference47 articles.
1. Ackerman, M.S., Cranor, L.F. and Reagle, J. (1999), “Privacy in e‐commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences”, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce EC'99.
2. Bateson, J.E.G. and Hui, M.K. (1992), “The ecological validity of photographic slides and videotapes in simulating the service setting”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 271‐82.
3. Bigley, G.A. and Pearce, J.L. (1998), “Straining for shared meaning in organization science: problems of trust and distrust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 405‐21.
4. Boatright, J.R. (2000), Ethics and the Conduct of Business, 3rd. ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Buchholz, R.A. and Rosenthal, S. (2002), “internet privacy: individual rights and the common good”, S.A.M. Advances Management Journal, Vol. 67 No. 1, pp. 34‐41.
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献