Are there barriers to independent non‐executive directors' effectiveness in performing their roles?

Author:

Azlan Annuar Hairul

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether non‐executive directors (NEDs) in Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs) may be facing certain barriers in the performance of their roles.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative approach, consisting of a series of interviews with board members, was chosen. The sampling frame was made as large as possible and for the purpose of this study, consisted of board members who sit on the main board of Malaysian‐owned PLCs.FindingsThe interviews revealed that a majority of the interviewees perceived that the barriers were either non‐existent or at least manageable. There were indications however that NEDs in small firms might face some of the problems suggested. The culture effect may also mediate their effectiveness in performing their roles. When there are barriers present, the most difficult problem faced by the NEDs concern time available to spend with the company.Research limitations/implicationsThis research utilized interviews. Generalizations may be an issue when interviews are used as the method of inquiry. Also, the sample is not random, as access to many directors depended on recommendations. In addition, respondents were consciously selected in order to obtain various board positions that include independent and non‐independent directors.Practical implicationsFindings from this research suggest that investors should not be overly concerned with their investments in Malaysian PLCs, as the NEDs are able to strongly discharge their responsibilities in overseeing executives' conduct and protecting investors' interest. The NEDs did not appear to face problems and hostilities from their host companies and it would be an added benefit to everyone concerned if they were able to more properly manage their time.Originality/valueThere is a lack of work on studying barriers to NEDs' effectiveness in developing countries, as previous work and literature reviews have been predominantly based upon the experience of Western economies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference40 articles.

1. Clarke, T. (2000), “Haemorrhaging tigers: the power of international financial markets and the weaknesses of Asian modes of corporate governance”, Corporate Governance International Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 101‐16.

2. Daily, C.M. and Johnson, J.L. (1997), “Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: a longitudinal assessment”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 97‐117.

3. Daily, C.M. and Schwenk, C. (1996), “Chief executive officers, top management teams and board of directors: congruent or countervailing forces?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 22, pp. 185‐202.

4. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. and Canella, A.A. (2003), “Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 371‐82.

5. Finkelstein, S. (1992), “Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement and validation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 505‐38.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3