Do business angels benefit their investee companies?
Author:
Macht Stephanie A.,Robinson John
Abstract
PurposeEntrepreneurial businesses often face financial and experiential gaps, which can constrain their growth. Business angels (BAs) can provide sources of financial, human and social capital to overcome these gaps. Building on the work by Munck and Saublens, this paper aims to introduce a framework that seeks to provide a detailed understanding of the benefits that BAs can bring to the firms in which they invest.Design/methodology/approachIn order to obtain a detailed understanding of the benefits that BAs bring to their investee companies, semi‐structured, in‐depth telephone interviews were conducted from an investee perspective. The key managers of nine angel‐funded companies were purposefully selected and the transcribed interviews analysed with the help of common qualitative analysis techniques.FindingsAccording to investee managers, BAs provide benefits in all four areas of the proposed framework. Specifically, BAs: help overcome funding gaps; fill knowledge/experience gaps through provision of their own expertise and involvement; provide a wide range of contacts and leverage further funding, including their own follow‐on finance.Research limitations/implicationsThe anonymous nature of the BA market requires convenience sampling, which, in addition to the small sample size used, does not allow for generalisability. The use of telephone interviews instead of face‐to‐face interviews did not allow for observation of non‐verbal cues. Nevertheless, the study identified various areas in need of further research.Originality/valueIn‐depth interview data enabled a detailed exploration of the financial and non‐financial benefits of BA funding from an under‐utilised investee perspective. The paper's main value, however, lies in establishing the usefulness of a framework showing BAs' benefits in a structured manner.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference75 articles.
1. Alsos, G.A., Kolvereid, L. and Isaksen, E.J. (2006), “New business early performance: differences between firms started by novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs”, in Christensen, P.R. and Poulfelt, F. (Eds), Managing Complexity and Change in SMEs: Frontiers in European Research, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 35‐49. 2. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R.N., Tune, K. and Reinach, J. (2002), “The role of angel investors in the assembly of non‐financial resources of new ventures: conceptual framework and empirical evidence”, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 39‐65. 3. Baeyens, K. and Manigart, S. (2006), “Follow‐on financing of venture capital backed companies: the choice between debt, equity, existing and new investors”, working paper, Ghent University, Gent, January. 4. Barney, J.B., Busenitz, L.W., Fiet, J.O. and Moesel, D.D. (1996), “New venture teams' assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 257‐72. 5. Barrow, C., Burke, G., Molian, D. and Brown, R. (2005), Enterprise Development: The Challenges of Starting, Growing and Selling Businesses, Thomson Learning, London.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|