Multi-modular design optimization and multidisciplinary design optimization
Author:
Adami Amirhossein,Mortazavi Mahda,Nosratollahi Mehran
Abstract
Purpose
– For complex engineering problems, multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) techniques use some disciplines that need to be run several times in different modules. In addition, mathematical modeling of a discipline can be improved for each module. The purpose of this paper is to show that multi-modular design optimization (MMO) improves the design performances in comparison with MDO technique for complex systems.
Design/methodology/approach
– MDO framework and MMO framework are developed to optimum design of a complex system. The nonlinear equality and inequality constrains are considered. The system optimizers included Genetic Algorithm and Sequential Quadratic Programming.
Findings
– As shown, fewer design variables (optimization variables) are needed at the system level for MMO. Unshared variables are optimized in the related module when shared variables are optimized at the system level. The results of this research show that MMO has lower elapsed times (14 percent) with lower F-count (16 percent).
Practical implications
– The monopropellant propulsion upper-stage is selected as a case study. In this paper, the efficient model of the monopropellant propulsion system is proposed. According to the results, the proposed model has acceptable accuracy in mass model (error
<
2 percent), performance estimation (error
<
6 percent) and geometry estimation (error
<
10 percent).
Originality/value
– The monopropellant propulsion system is broken down into the three important modules including propellant tank (tank and propellant), pressurized feeding (tank and gas) and thruster (catalyst, nozzle and catalysts bed) when chemical decomposition, aerothermodynamics, mass and configuration, catalyst and structure have been considered as the disciplines. The both MMO and MDO frameworks are developed for the monopropellant propulsion system.
Reference24 articles.
1. Adami, A.
(2015), “Multidicsiplinary design optimization of reentry vehicle considering guidance algorithm”, Phd thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran. 2. Adami, A.
,
Mortazavi, M.
and
Nosratollahi, M.
(2015a), “Multidisciplinary design optimization of a deorbit maneuver considering propulsion, TPS, and trajectory”,
International Journal of Computer Applications
, Vol. 116 No. 23, pp. 1-6. 3. Adami, A.
,
Mortazavi, M.
and
Nosratollahi, M.
(2015b), “Multidisciplinary design hybrid optimization of hydrazine monopropellant propulsion system”,
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology
, Vol. 88 No. 6. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-05-2014-0061.R3. 4. Adami, A.
,
Mortazavi, M.
and
Nosratollahi, M.
(2015c), “Multidisciplinary design optimization of hydrogen peroxide monopropellant propulsion system using GA and SQP”,
International Journal of Computer Applications
, Vol. 113 No. 9, pp. 14-21. 5. Agte, J.
,
Weck, O.D.E.
,
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.
,
Arendsen, J.
,
Morris, P.
and
Spieck, M.
(2010), “MDO assessment and direction for advancement – an opinion of one international group”,
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Journal
, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 17-33.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|