Author:
Davis Alana,Doyle Michael,Quayle Ethel,O'Rourke Suzanne
Abstract
Purpose
– Previously, diversion from the criminal justice system for people with learning disability (LD) and serious forensic needs in Scotland meant hospitalisation. More recently new legislation has meant that community-based rehabilitation is possible for this group. The purpose of this paper is to qualitatively explore the views of people with LD subject to these legal orders. This is both a chance to work in partnership to improve services and also to make the voices of this potentially vulnerable group heard.
Design/methodology/approach
– Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten participants subject to a community-based order. All participants were male. Ages, index behaviour, and time spent on order varied. The data was transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Findings
– The main themes which emerged from the data were a taste of freedom, not being in control, getting control back, loneliness, and feeling like a service user. Participants described positives about community-based rehabilitation but also a number of negatives.
Practical implications
– Participant accounts suggest that the current community rehabilitation model has some shortcomings which need to be addressed. Suggestions are made for improvements to the current model relating to: achieving clarity over the role of support staff and pathways out of the system; increasing opportunities for service users to voice concerns; empowering staff teams via extensive training and supervision; and directly addressing internalised stigma to promote community integration.
Originality/value
– This is the first piece of work evaluating compulsory community forensic care for people with LD from the perspective of service users. It highlights difficulties with the system which could lead to helpful ways to evolve this model.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Phychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference57 articles.
1. Aust, S.
(2010), “Is The Good Lives Model of offender treatment relevant to sex offenders with a learning disability?”,
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour
, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 33-9.
2. Barron, P.
,
Hassiotis, A.
and
Banes, J.
(2002), “Offenders with intellectual disability: the size of the problem and therapeutic outcomes”,
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 454-63.
3. Beacock, C.
(2005), “The policy context”, in
Riding, T.
,
Swann, C.
and
Swann, B.
(Eds),
The Handbook of Forensic Learning Disabilities
, Radcliffe, Oxford, pp. 1-5.
4. Breckon, S.E.
,
Smith, I.C.
and
Daiches, A.
(2013), “What makes offenders with an intellectual disability ready to engage with psychological therapy? A qualitative study”,
Research in Learning Disabilities
, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 1408-16.
5. Campbell, J.
,
Brophy, L.
,
Healy, B.
and
O’Brien, A.
(2006), “International perspectives on the use of community treatment orders: implications for mental health social workers”,
British Journal of Social Work
, Vol. 36 No. 7, pp. 1101-18.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献