Older adults’ household cooking: card sort analyses

Author:

Bostic Stephanie M.,Bisogni Carole A.,Sobal Jeffery

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine food preparation practices of US older adults by assessing their conceptualization of food preparation methods and their routine use of food preparation methods and kitchen equipment. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 17 community-dwelling older adults used cards with names of food preparation methods and cooking equipment items to do one open sort and three closed sorts about: food preparation method classifications; food preparation method use frequency; kitchen equipment use frequency; and essential vs non-essential kitchen equipment. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, and qualitative thematic analysis were performed. Findings – Participants classified food preparation methods using multiple dimensions: ways to alter food, inputs, location, timing, and personal behavior. They used a wide range of food preparation methods and kitchen equipment items in routine cooking. The mean number of the 38 preparation methods sorted as used “often” was 16.5±5.0. In total, 15 of the 17 participants reported using more than 20 of the 40 equipment items “often.” The mean number of equipment items identified as “essential” was 21.5±9.3. Practical implications – Food professionals should consider access to equipment and food preparation skills and preferences when designing products and working with consumers. Addressing gaps in human and material capital may support adoption of food preparation practices. Originality/value – Food preparation method and equipment use frequency has rarely been examined from the household cook’s perspective. Using card sorts is a novel approach to examining consumer classification of an extensive list of preparation methods and kitchen equipment.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference40 articles.

1. Andersson, I. and Sidenvall, B. (2001), “Case studies of food shopping, cooking and eating habits in older women with Parkinson’s disease”, Journal of Advanced Nursing , Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 69-78.

2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012), “Australia’s Food and Nutrition 2012: in brief” No. PHE 164, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, available at: www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737422357 (accessed July 30, 2015).

3. Bar, H. and Mentch, L. (2015), “R CMap”, Version August, Storrs, CT, Unpublished.

4. Beck, M.E. (2007), “Dinner preparation in the modern United States”, British Food Journal , Vol 109 No. 7, pp. 531-547.

5. Becker, G. (2008), “Human capital”, The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics , Library of Economics and Liberty, available at: www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HumanCapital.html (accessed August 3, 2015).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3