Author:
Abdulla Al Mamun Syed,Badir Yousre
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine whether there is a firm-level corporate governance (CG) convergence in two emerging economies, namely Malaysia and Thailand in post-Asian financial crisis periods, and how the level of convergence is moderated by different firm-specific factors.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using data collected from annual reports of top Malaysian and Thai companies in two point of times 2005 and 2008, this research examines the attributes of board of directors to find the firm-level CG convergence. This study, based on prior literature, identified firm-specific factors to assess their moderating impact on the level of convergence. This paper exploits beta and sigma convergence technique to measure the CG convergence.
Findings
– Results show that top Malaysian and Thai companies have developed internal CG practices in similar way with increasing board independent, separate board leadership, important board committees, board education, and participation in the post-crisis reform regime. Accordingly, there is a firm-level CG convergence within companies of an individual country, i.e. intra-convergence, and companies across the countries, i.e. inter-convergence. Notwithstanding, the study does not find the unconditional convergence in all CG variables. Additionally, it observes that the firm-level CG convergence is moderated by firm-specific factors.
Practical implications
– Outcomes of the study have the implication to understand the complicated changing aspects of internal CG practices in emerging economies which, in turn, can help to formulate and implement effective CG structure so that firms can tackle adverse effects of any further economic crisis. Because this paper highlights that the firms in these emerging economies have enough room yet to improve their CG practices to become internationally competitive.
Originality/value
– This paper demonstrates how internal CG practices may evolve and converge in emerging Southeast Asian economies. Results related to moderating factors of firm-level CG convergence contribute in literature by exploring a new dimension of CG convergence.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting
Reference70 articles.
1. Agrawal, A.
and
Knoeber, C.R.
(1996), “Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 377-397.
2. Aguilera, R.V.
and
Cuervo-Cazurra, A.
(2004), “Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger?”, Organization Studies, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 415-443.
3. Asian Development Bank
(2000), Corporate Governance and Finance in East Asia – A Study of Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand, Vol. 1, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
4. Bebchuk, L.
and
Roe, M.
(2000), “A theory of path dependence in corporate governance and ownership”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 121-170.
5. Black, B.S.
,
Jang, H.
and
Woochan, K.
(2006), “Predicting firms’ corporate governance choices: evidence from Korea”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 660-691.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献