Author:
Annink Anne,den Dulk Laura,Steijn Bram
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to map and understand work-family state support for the self-employed compared to employees across European countries.
Design/methodology/approach
– To map state work-family support policies for the self-employed, an overview of public childcare, maternity, paternity, and parental leave arrangements across European countries is created based on databases, local government web sites, and local experts’ country notes. Secondary data analyses are conducted in order to compare support for the self-employed to support for employees and across countries. Differences across countries are analysed from a welfare state regime perspective, which explicates assumptions about the role of the government in providing work-family state support and which is often used in research on work-family support for employees.
Findings
– Results show that, in general, the self-employed receive less work-family state support than employees or none at all. The extensiveness of work-family state support varies widely across European countries. Patterns of welfare states regimes, which explain variation in work-family support for employees, can also be found in the context of self-employment.
Practical implications
– Findings result in practical suggestions for policy makers at the European and national level to monitor policy compliance considering maternity leave for the self-employed, to increase childcare support, and to rethink the European Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan.
Originality/value
– Work-family state support for the growing number of self-employed has never been mapped before, although this is a very topical issue for (European) policy makers. This paper offers a starting point to contextualise and understand the way self-employed experience the work-family interface in different country contexts.
Reference57 articles.
1. Allen, T.D.
,
Herst, D.E.L.
,
Bruck, C.S.
and
Sutton, M.
(2000), “Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda for future research”,
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 278-308.
2. Arendarski, A.
,
Mroczhowski, T.
and
Sood, J.
(1994), “Private enterprise in Poland: policies for continued growth”,
Journal of Small Business Management
, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 40-51.
3. Arenius, P.
and
Kovalainen, A.
(2006), “Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women’s self-employment preferences in the Nordic countries”,
International Small Business Journal
, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 31-59.
4. Arum, R.
and
Müller, W.
(2004),
The Re-Emergence of Self-Employment: A Comparative Study of Self-Employment Dynamics And Social Inequality
, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. Bell, A.
and
La Valle, I.
(2003),
Combining Self-Employment With Family Life
, The Policy Press, Bristol.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献