Making meaning of nursing practices in acute care

Author:

Lake Sarah,Rudge Trudy,West Sandra

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider how meaning may be made of nursing practices by contrasting the rationalistic approach commonly used in the nursing literature with Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Design/methodology/approach – The data under consideration is an account of ten to 15 minutes of a larger ethnographic study of nursing practices which asks the question: how do nurses accomplish nursing within and between patients’ needs for care in the acute hospital setting? The five main sources of data were: observations of and conversations with nurse participants, as well as hospital documentation (including facility protocols and patients’ notes) and the observer’s field diary. These were woven together to provide an account of one nurse with one patient for a few moments of her day. Findings – Although this paper makes no attempt to speak to the rest of her workload, in these few minutes the nurse accomplishes multiple moments of nursing practice. Further, while the rationalistic approach presents the nurse as a highly skilled practitioner, Bourdieu’s theory of practice not only illuminates the nurse’s role as pivotal in the acute hospital setting but is also able to address the dialectical nature of the relationship between nurses’ practices and the dynamics of the context. Originality/value – The use of Bourdieu’s theory of practice makes possible the study of how nurses nurse “within and between” to illuminate the everyday practices of nurses.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference43 articles.

1. Benner, P. (2000), “The wisdom of our practice”, American Journal of Nursing , Vol. 100 No. 10, pp. 99, 101, 103.

2. Benner, P. , Stannard, D. and Hooper, P.L. (1996), “A ‘Thinking-in-Action’ approach to teaching clinical judgment: a classroom innovation for acute care advanced practice nurses”, Advanced Practice Nursing Quarterly , Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 70-77.

3. Boblin-Cummings, S. , Baumann, A.O. and Deber, R. (1999), “Critical elements in the process of decision making: a nursing perspective”, Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 6-13.

4. Borbasi, S. (1994), “To be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?”, Nursing Inquiry , Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 57.

5. Borbasi, S. (1995), “Extending the debate: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?”, Nursing Inquiry , Vol. 2 No. 2, p. 117.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3