Abstract
PurposeEntrepreneurship education scholarship has been recently challenged to look at what goes on inside the entrepreneurship classroom to assess what students are really learning. Relying on the construction and analysis of a 3-h long set of learning activities on responsible entrepreneurship, this paper focuses on the activities conducted and what students have learned, based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives.Design/methodology/approachThis paper builds on a pre-/post-intervention assessment around a set of learning activities with 151 undergraduate students. Before and after the class, students were asked to produce a definition of responsible entrepreneurship. They were also asked to reflect on what had changed from the beginning.FindingsAnalysis of students' pre/post definitions shows a standardization of their conceptions of responsible entrepreneurship. This result confirms that the learning objective of this class was met. Nevertheless, applying Bloom's revised taxonomy to students' reflections allows for more nuanced interpretation. The analysis indeed revealed that some students manifest relatively superficial learning while other shows a deeper ability to reflect on the concept.Originality/valueFirst, this paper contributes to the entrepreneurship education literature by showing the relevance of using Bloom's revised taxonomy for both teaching and research purposes. Second, it presents a set of innovative learning activities on responsible entrepreneurship that could be easily reproduced in other educational contexts. Third, it shows the importance of asking students what they learned and what has changed for them through class activities.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference45 articles.
1. Achtenhagen, L. and Johannisson, B. (2018), “The reflexivity grid”, in Berglund, K. and Verduijn, K. (Eds), Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education. Adopting a Critical Approach in the Classroom, Routledge, London, pp. 62-81.
2. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives;Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA,2015
3. Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds), (2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman, London.
4. EDLE: an integrated tool to foster entrepreneurial skills development in engineering education;Educational Technology Research and Development,2018
5. Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom's taxonomy as a learning tool;Journal of Management Education,2003
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献