Should youth disclose their mental health challenges? Perspectives from students, parents, and school professionals

Author:

Buchholz Blythe,Aylward Stephanie,McKenzie Sue,Corrigan Patrick

Abstract

Purpose – Disclosure seems to be a useful strategy for adults to deal with both the public and self-stigma of mental illness. However, youth may face a different set of risks when coming out with their experiences. The purpose of this paper is to examine youth, parent, and teacher perspectives on the costs and benefits of disclosure by middle- and high school-aged youth to better understand these risks. Design/methodology/approach – Focus groups were conducted with questions framed to elicit the different ways mental health challenges are discussed in schools and families. Findings – Surprisingly, the benefits of disclosure seemed to far outweigh the costs across groups. Benefits included ways to deal with stigma, reducing isolation, and “differentness,” as well as the pursuit of mental health services if needed. Costs included harsh responses to disclosure by peers and family members. Participants shared strategies used to minimize risk, including where and with whom youth might share their stories. Social implications – The results suggest many youth have disclosed their experiences with mental health challenges and have received mixed responses; these reactions often serve as the barometer for future disclosure decisions. Other youth are considering disclosure in a variety of settings, but are unsure how to go about it safely. Implications for addressing stigma are discussed. Originality/value – To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative research study conducted with youth about disclosure of mental illness experiences. These results will help guide modification of programming that could be beneficial in aiding disclosure decisions and reducing disclosure-related risks for youth who come out.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference23 articles.

1. Berg, B.L. (2004), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , Vol. 5, Pearson, Boston, MA.

2. Callard, F. , Sartorius, N. , Arboleda-Flórez, J. , Bartlett, P. , Helmchen, H. , Stuart, H. , Taborda, J. and Thornicroft, G. (2012), “Work and the workplace”, Mental Illness, Discrimination and the Law: Fighting for Social Justice , John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, pp. 79-88.

3. Corrigan, P.W. , Kosyluk, K.A. and Rüsch, N. (2013), “Reducing self-stigma by coming out proud”, American Journal of Public Health , Vol. 103 No. 5, pp. 794-800.

4. Corrigan, P.W. , Sokol, K.A. and Rüsch, N. (2013), “The impact of self-stigma and mutual help programs on the quality of life of people with serious mental illnesses”, Community Mental Health Journal , Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 1-6.

5. Corrigan, P.W. , Morris, S.B. , Michaels, P.J. , Rafacz, J.D. and Rüsch, N. (2012), “Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies”, Psychiatric Services , Vol. 63 No. 10, pp. 963-73.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3