Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the progress in public and patient involvement (PPI) in public health research, and identify the relevant problems and solutions.
Design/methodology/approach
To explore the advantages and drawbacks of PPI in health research, drawing on studies which have looked at the barriers to effective PPI, as well as the benefits to all parties.
Findings
Guidelines have emerged from recent research for the process of PPI throughout a project; however different schemes for PPI will apply, depending on the context.
Research limitations/implications
There are not many well-researched studies into PPI in this area. A frequent limitation in research projects is that there is not sufficient provision for PPI. The implication is that more time and funding should be made available for well-planned PPI.
Practical implications
Researchers need to find more ways for involvement, as well as optimising current methods.
Social implications
The growth of PPI has opened up channels of communication and developed new roles for people in research, who would not otherwise be involved.
Originality/value
The paper draws together a range of studies in an original way, as well as using some unpublished material. It is an area of current interest.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference16 articles.
1. Torbay Healthy Housing Group,2007
2. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda;Health Policy,2002
3. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review;Health Expectations,2014
4. Learning to work together – lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement;Research Involvement and Engagement,2016
5. IMPRESS (2016a), “Julia Keenan, The project itself and its findings”, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL9EbvYmaxA (accessed 18 March 2017).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献