Author:
Cheng Colin C.J.,Shiu Eric C.
Abstract
Purpose
– Despite extensive published research into the relationship between open innovation (OI) activities and performance, the nature and direction of the relationship remain inconclusive. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship as to how firms’ inbound and outbound OI activities, as well as their interaction influence incremental and radical innovation performance. The authors also consider the potentially mediating roles of knowledge learning and organizational capabilities in such a relationship.
Design/methodology/approach
– To investigate this relationship, data were collected from a cross-industry survey of 304 leading Taiwanese-based firms. Three-stage least square analysis was employed to test the model.
Findings
– Analyses reveal that knowledge learning and organizational capabilities mediate the OI activities-innovation performance relationship. In addition, a firm focussing on inbound activities enhances its radical innovation performance, but hinders its incremental innovation performance, while focussing on outbound activities produces the opposite effects. Among the findings, it is worth emphasizing that the effect of the interaction between inbound and outbound activities on innovation performance can be counter-productive.
Research limitations/implications
– The findings demonstrate that existing studies only partially explain the effects of OI activities on innovation performance. Understanding how OI activities influence innovation performance will facilitate more informed decision making, leading to more effective use of OI activities.
Practical implications
– The results suggest that managers need to consider knowledge learning and organizational capabilities in order to fully capture the potential effects of OI activities. Managers also need to be aware of the limitations of OI activities.
Originality/value
– The theoretical model presented here offers a timely contribution to the theory base underpinning the development of OI activities for innovation performance.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference81 articles.
1. Aiken, L.
and
West, S.
(1991),
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Ailawadi, K.
and
Harlam, B.
(2004), “An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: the role of store-brand share”,
Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 147-165.
3. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 103 No. 8, pp. 411-423.
4. Armstrong, S.
and
Overton, T.
(1977), “Estimating non-response in mailed surveys”,
Journal of Marketing Research
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.
5. Atuahene-Gima, K.
(2005), “Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation”,
Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 61-83.
Cited by
85 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献