Investigating models of adult safeguarding in England – a mixed-methods approach

Author:

Norrie Caroline,Stevens Martin,Graham Katherine,Manthorpe Jill,Moriarty Jo,Hussein Shereen

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology being used in a study exploring the organisation of adult safeguarding. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed-methods study is presented which describes how the research team is seeking to identify models of adult safeguarding and then compare them using a quasi-experimental study design. Findings – Close examination of this study's methodology highlights the potential value of mixed-method research approaches. Research limitations/implications – Anticipated study challenges include difficulties with gaining agreement from study sites and recruitment of people who have been the subject of a safeguarding referral. Originality/value – This will be the first study in England to identify and compare different models of adult safeguarding in depth. Outlining and discussing current methodology is likely to be of interest to practitioners, managers and other researchers and policy makers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference35 articles.

1. Basit, T. (2003), “Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis”, Educational Research, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 143-54.

2. Cambridge, P. , Beadle-Brown, J. , Milne, A. , Mansell, J. and Whelton, B. (2011), “Adult protection: the processes and outcomes of adult protection referrals in two English local authorities”, Journal of Social Work, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 247-67.

3. Commission for Social Care Inspection (2006), Joint Investigation Into the Provision of Services for People with Learning Disabilities at Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust, Healthcare Commission, London.

4. Collins, M. (2010), “Thresholds in adult protection”, The Journal of Adult Protection, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 4-12.

5. Curtis, L. (2009), “Unit costs of health and social care, personal social services research unit”, available at: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/24882/1/uc2009.pdf (accessed 7 March 2012).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3