New e-sources, new models: reinventing library approaches to providing access

Author:

Soules Aline

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose that librarians consider new ways of working in order to manage new types of electronic sources.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a literature survey, readings outside the literature, and observations in the field.FindingsLibrarians need to think out of the box, change how they structure their organizations and work, and cede more control to users.Research limitations/implicationsThis is an opinion piece urging librarians to think differently.Practical implicationsIf librarians could think out of the box, give up their traditional organizational lines, and cede more control to users, managing new forms of electronic resources would be easier.Social implicationsChanging ways of thinking is a long, difficult process.Originality/valueThis paper was originally presented at the IFLA conference in Milan in August 2009.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference20 articles.

1. Antelman, K., Lynema, E. and Pace, A.K. (2006), “Toward a twenty‐first century library catalog”, Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 128‐39.

2. Armstrong, K., Nardini, B., McCracken, P. and Lugg, R. (2009), “When did (e)‐books become serials?” The Serials Librarian, Vol. 56 Nos. 1/14, pp. 129‐38.

3. Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (2001), “Committee on cataloging: description and access”, Task Force on the Review of “Revising AACR2 to Accommodate Seriality: Rule Revision Proposals”, Discussion paper, January 7, available at: www.libraries.psu.edu/tas/jca/ccda/tf‐serr3.html

4. Chambers, M.B., Harner, R. and Gregory, G. (2004), “Out of the back room and onto the desk: technical services librarian in the public arena”, Colorado Libraries, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 46‐7.

5. Eden, B. (2008), “Ending the status quo”, American Libraries, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 38‐9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3