Emerging information standards and technologies: cataloging and metadata professionals’ perspectives

Author:

Park Jung ran,Tosaka Yuji

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to report on the survey results relating to the current experience of cataloging and metadata professionals with emerging information standards and technologies, as well as the state of professional training and existing barriers to continuing education (CE) in these emerging areas. Design/methodology/approach The paper presents a quantitative analysis of the data collected in the online survey, supplemented with a qualitative analysis of some open-ended responses. Findings There was a wide interest in leveraging emerging Semantic Web and Linked Data approaches. Training activities on newer information standards and technologies were reported by more than half of the respondents. The survey data suggested the importance of increasing field-wide collaborations and institution- or organization-level support for professional development. Improving the discoverability of relevant CE resources and programs was also considered to be the key, as were affordability and the ability to incorporate ongoing learning into everyday practice. Originality/value There are currently no comprehensive studies or benchmarked data on how the existing CE system meets the needs of cataloging and metadata professionals. This study establishes a baseline for an understanding of their ongoing professional development preferences and requirements relating to new information standards and technologies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference10 articles.

1. 2016 top trends in academic libraries: a review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education;ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee;College & Research Libraries News,2016

2. Archer, T. (2008), “Response rates to expect from web-based surveys and what to do about it”, Journal of Extension, Vol. 46 No. 3, available at: www.joe.org/joe/2008june/rb3.php (accessed 1 November 2016).

3. Breeding, M. (2016), “Library systems report”, American Libraries, May, available at: https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2016/05/02/library-systems-report-2016/ (accessed 1 November 2016).

4. Drummond, C. (Ed.). (2016), National Agenda for Continuing Education and Professional Development Across Libraries, Archives, and Museums, OCLC, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-national-agenda-lams-education-development-2016.pdf (accessed 31 October 2016).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3