Author:
Cohen Sandra,Karatzimas Sotirios
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to debate the future form of reporting in the public sector by examining alternative forms of reporting, and more specifically the frameworks of integrated reporting and popular reporting. Moreover, the paper explores whether and how these reports could be related to each other in order for the needs of a pillar user group, that of the citizens, to be addressed.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors analyze the frameworks of integrated reporting and popular reporting, and by combining their characteristics the authors propose a creative synthesis suitable for the public sector.
Findings
– The analysis leads to the conclusion that governmental entities need to take the next step on reporting in two parallel levels: the first would require the publication of information encountered in integrated reports containing various information elements that are not confronted to the traditional financial ones. The second would result in the provision of this information in a concise and easily comprehensive way. The merger of these two streams will give rise to the publication of “Integrated Popular Reports – IPR.”
Originality/value
– This move would result to useful and meaningful reporting with potential strategic advantages. The integrated reporting dimension of the reports combined to the popular reporting dimension would provide an adequate information matrix for citizens and other user groups (e.g. politicians, public executives), that are interested to understand the “whole picture” of public sector entities but at the same time they neither possess advanced accounting knowledge nor they are familiar with technical terminology.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference63 articles.
1. Abeysekera, I.
(2013), “A template for integrated reporting”,
Journal of Intellectual Capital
, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 227-245.
2. Adams, S.
and
Simnett, R.
(2011), “Integrated reporting: an opportunity for Australia’s not-for-profit sector”,
Australian Accounting Review
, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 292-301.
3. Adhikari, P.
and
Mellemvik, F.
(2010), “Cash reporting in developing countries: the case of Nepalese central government”,
International Journal of Government Financial Management
, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 36-48.
4. Adhikari, P.
,
Timoshenko, K.
and
Gårseth-Nesbakk, L.
(2012), “Reforming central government accounting in diverse contexts: a three-country comparison”,
International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 44-60.
5. Anessi-Pessina, E.
,
Sicilia, M.
and
Steccolini, I.
(2012), “Budgeting and rebudgeting in local governments: siamese twins?”,
Public Administration Review
, Vol. 72 No. 6, pp. 875-884.
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献