Empowering users with a new online catalog

Author:

Lombardo Shawn V.,Condic Kristine S.

Abstract

In June 1998 Oakland University’s library migrated to a new online catalog. In order to determine user acceptance of the new OPAC, students receiving library instruction were asked to complete an open‐ended questionnaire eliciting comments on their likes, dislikes and online catalog preference. From the data collected, a second questionnaire was designed and distributed that focused on specific features of the new catalog identified in the first survey. Results indicated that users overwhelmingly preferred the new OPAC and found it easy to use; however, they experienced some difficulty using special features like truncation. The most popular feature of the new catalog was its remote access capability. Second‐generation OPACs possess features – such as electronic reserves capabilities and hypertext links – that are beginning to simplify the search process; but they have not yet developed into the intuitive, comprehensive systems that can empower users to seek information in new ways.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference12 articles.

1. Ashoor, M.S. and Khurshid, Z. (1987), “User reactions to the online catalog at the University of Petroleum and Minerals library”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 221‐5

2. Berger, K.W. and Hines, R.W. (1994), “What does the user really want? The library user survey project at Duke University”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 20 No. 5‐6, pp. 306‐9.

3. Borgman, C.L. (1996), “Why are online catalogs still hard to use?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 493‐503.

4. Carter, T. and Park, H.O. (1993), “A user survey of the online public access catalog at California State University, Fresno”, Library Software Review, Vol.12 No. 2, pp. 43‐53.

5. Cherry, J.M. and Clinton, M. (1992), “OPACs at five Ontario universities: a profile of users and user satisfaction”, Canadian Library Journal, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 123‐33.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Service-oriented information technologies in library processes and scientific communication;Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS;2022-02-28

2. OPAC functionality: Russian and foreign users’ requirements;Scientific and Technical Libraries;2020-09-19

3. Le catalogue réinventé;Documentation et bibliothèques;2015-03-19

4. Relevance of Subject Descriptions in an Online Public Access Catalogue;Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti;2013-09-10

5. Does VuFind Meet the Needs of Web 2.0 Users?;Advances in Library and Information Science;2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3