Exploring faculty experiences with e‐books: a focus group

Author:

Carlock Danielle M.,Maughan Perry Anali

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe how, in the spring of 2007, Arizona State University Libraries held a focus group of selected faculty to discover their perceptions and use of electronic books (e‐books) in their research and teaching.Design/methodology/approachThe services of the Institute of Social Sciences Research were employed to recruit and moderate the focus group. Major themes explored were: use of e‐books as textbooks; use of e‐books for personal research; comparison between e‐books and print; disciplinary differences in perceptions of e‐books; and motivators for future use.FindingsOverall, the focus group revealed that faculty had generally unsatisfactory experiences in using e‐books in their research and teaching owing to the unreliability of access, lack of manipulability, and the steep learning curve of the various interfaces. However, most faculty agreed that e‐books would be a very viable and useful alternative if these issues were resolved.Research limitations/implicationsThe focus group consisted of only six faculty members and hence is not representative of faculty as a whole. A larger survey of a more diverse faculty population would greatly serve to clarify and expand upon the findings.Practical implicationsThe implications for academic libraries include providing better outreach and training to faculty about the e‐book platforms offered, provide better course support, and advocate to e‐book vendors to consider faculty's teaching and research needs in their product development.Originality/valueThis is believed to be the first published study of faculty opinions and use of e‐books utilizing focus group methodology and offers detailed information that would be useful for academic libraries and e‐book vendors for evidence‐based decisions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference13 articles.

1. Anuradha, K.T. and Usha, H.S. (2006), “Use of e‐books in an academic and research environment: a case study from the Indian Institute of Science”, Program, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 48‐62.

2. Appleton, L. (2004), “The use of electronic books in midwifery education: the student perspective”, Health Information & Libraries Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 245‐52.

3. Chu, H. (2003), “Electronic books: viewpoints from users and potential users”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 340‐6.

4. Cox, J. (2004), “E‐books: challenges and opportunities”, D‐Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 10, p. 1, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/october04/10contents.html (accessed November 30, 2007).

5. Ebrary (2007), 2007 Global Faculty Survey E‐book Survey, available at: www.ebrary.com/corp/collateral/en/Survey/ebrary_eBook_survey_2007.pdf (accessed November 30, 2007).

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3